Institutional Repository
Technical University of Crete
EN  |  EL

Search

Browse

My Space

A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: the case of financial distress

Zopounidis Konstantinos, Michael Doumpos

Full record


URI: http://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/9EDA04C9-46AA-4A98-AD0C-386DF938A70A
Year 1999
Type of Item Peer-Reviewed Journal Publication
License
Details
Bibliographic Citation C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos, "A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: the case of financial distress," Computat. Econ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 197-218, Dec. 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1008713823812 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008713823812
Appears in Collections

Summary

Sorting problems constitute a major part of real world decisions, where a set of alternative actions (solutions) must be classified into two or more predefined classes. Multicriteria decision aid (MCDA) provides several methodologies, which are well adapted in sorting problems. A well known approach in MCDA is based on preference disaggregation which has already been used in ranking problems, but it is also applicable in sorting problems. The UTADIS (UTilités Additives DIScriminantes) method, a variant of the UTA method, based on the preference disaggregation approach estimates a set of additive utility functions and utility profiles using linear programming techniques in order to minimize the misclassification error between the predefined classes in sorting problems. This paper presents the application of the UTADIS method in two real world classification problems concerning the field of financial distress. The applications are derived by the studies of Slowinski and Zopounidis (1995), and Dimitras et al. (1999). The obtained results depict the superiority of the UTADIS method over discriminant analysis, and they are also comparable with the results derived by other multicriteria methods.

Services

Statistics