Institutional Repository
Technical University of Crete
EN  |  EL

Search

Browse

My Space

Primary normal-stress difference for two liquid crystalline copolyesters

Gotsis Alexandros, Baird, David, 1956-

Simple record


URIhttp://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/64576DAC-DCFA-4C28-8E1F-452EE631426A-
Identifierhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01357954-
Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF01357954-
Languageen-
Extent12 pagesen
TitlePrimary normal-stress difference for two liquid crystalline copolyestersen
CreatorGotsis Alexandrosen
CreatorΓκοτσης Αλεξανδροςel
CreatorBaird, David, 1956-en
PublisherSpringer Verlagen
Content SummaryThe primary normal-stress difference,N 1, was determined in both steady and transient shear flow experiments for thermotropic copolyesters of 60 and 80 mole% p-hydroxybenzoic acid (PHB) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET).N 1 was observed to be negative for the 80 mole% system at low shear rates and temperatures below 332 °C (a tensile stress, e.g. σ11 is taken here to be positive). At higher shear rates and for temperatures above 332 °C,N 1 was found to be positive. Values ofN 1 for the 60 mole% pHBA/PET system were always positive over the same range of shear rates. Although it is not certain as to the origin of the negative values, a probable cause is small density changes upon the inception of flow as well as the existence of a solid phase or some texture development in the melt. However, it is shown that it is thermodynamically admissible for liquid crystalline fluids to exhibit negative values ofN 1.en
Type of ItemPeer-Reviewed Journal Publicationen
Type of ItemΔημοσίευση σε Περιοδικό με Κριτέςel
Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
Date of Item2015-11-14-
Date of Publication1986-
SubjectLiquid crystalline copolyesteren
SubjectShear flowen
SubjectNegative primary normal-stress differenceen
Bibliographic CitationA. D. Gotsis and D. G. Baird, "Primary normal-stress difference for two liquid crystalline copolyesters", Rheolog. Acta, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 275-286, May 1986. doi:10.1007/BF01357954en

Services

Statistics