Ιδρυματικό Αποθετήριο
Πολυτεχνείο Κρήτης
EN  |  EL

Αναζήτηση

Πλοήγηση

Ο Χώρος μου

Centralised versus decentralised signal control of large-scale urban road networks in real time: a simulation study

Manolis Diamantis, Pappa Theodora, Diakaki Christina, Papamichail Ioannis, Papageorgiou Markos

Απλή Εγγραφή


URIhttp://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/12B652C5-DAB1-4E9E-AD38-03B2BFF59A6F-
Αναγνωριστικόhttps://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2018.0112-
Αναγνωριστικόhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8462713-
Γλώσσαen-
Μέγεθος10 pagesen
ΤίτλοςCentralised versus decentralised signal control of large-scale urban road networks in real time: a simulation studyen
ΔημιουργόςManolis Diamantisen
ΔημιουργόςΜανωλης Διαμαντηςel
ΔημιουργόςPappa Theodoraen
ΔημιουργόςΠαππα Θεοδωραel
ΔημιουργόςDiakaki Christinaen
ΔημιουργόςΔιακακη Χριστιναel
ΔημιουργόςPapamichail Ioannisen
ΔημιουργόςΠαπαμιχαηλ Ιωαννηςel
ΔημιουργόςPapageorgiou Markosen
ΔημιουργόςΠαπαγεωργιου Μαρκοςel
ΕκδότηςInstitution of Engineering and Technologyen
ΠερίληψηRecently, signal control strategies with decentralised logic have been developed to tackle the traffic congestion problems of urban road networks. Such strategies aim at network-wide traffic flow efficiency improvement via local actions, thus low design effort and infrastructure investment. This study presents, compares, and evaluates two such innovative approaches: the job scheduling algorithm comprising the local control component of the scalable urban traffic control (SURTRAC) system and the max- or back-pressure algorithm. The approaches are also compared against traffic-responsive urban control (TUC), a well-established strategy with centralised logic. Evaluation is based on the AIMSUN simulation model of the city centre of Chania, Greece. The study results indicate that the TUC and max-pressure retain performance independently of the prevailing traffic conditions, while also being computationally simpler than job scheduling. Both decentralised approaches require frequent (high-resolution) and relatively accurate measurements; on the other hand, TUC, although less demanding in this respect, calls for communication lines between the junction controllers and the central computer. Finally, compared with both decentralised approaches, the TUC provides a signal plan sequence with less excessive differences between each other, thus fewer disturbances to the common network users. Nevertheless, for more comprehensive conclusions, more investigations, including field trials, would be needed. en
ΤύποςPeer-Reviewed Journal Publicationen
ΤύποςΔημοσίευση σε Περιοδικό με Κριτέςel
Άδεια Χρήσηςhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
Ημερομηνία2019-05-31-
Ημερομηνία Δημοσίευσης2018-
Θεματική ΚατηγορίαComputer circuitsen
Θεματική ΚατηγορίαInvestmentsen
Θεματική ΚατηγορίαMotor transportationen
Θεματική ΚατηγορίαRoads and streetsen
Θεματική ΚατηγορίαScheduling algorithmsen
Θεματική ΚατηγορίαTraffic congestionen
Βιβλιογραφική ΑναφοράD. Manolis, T. Pappa, C. Diakaki, I. Papamichail and M. Papageorgiou "Centralised versus decentralised signal control of large-scale urban road networks in real time: a simulation study," IET Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 891-900, Oct. 2018. doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2018.0112en

Υπηρεσίες

Στατιστικά